Accu-Chek SmartGuide vs FreeStyle Libre 2 Plus
| Device | Wear time | Readings | Accuracy (MARD) | Alarms | Prescription | Price per sensor | Monthly cost | Cost to try | Cost, testing 4× a year | Yearly cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Accu-Chek SmartGuideRoche | 14 days | every 5 min | Not published | Yes | Not required | Not published | Not published | Not published | Not published | Not published |
| FreeStyle Libre 2 PlusAbbott | 15 days | every 1 min | Not published | Yes | Not required | £51.9915 days | £103.98per month | £51.9915 days | £207.96per year | £1,265.09per year |
Accu-Chek SmartGuide
The most genuinely different sensor here: the prediction features target the thing people actually fear, which is going low overnight. The trade-off is going back to calibration, and Roche publishing less about accuracy than its competitors.
FreeStyle Libre 2 Plus
The value choice in Abbott’s range. You give up some alarm range and the newest sensor hardware, and you keep the same fifteen-day wear for about £104 a month privately.